Role of the Massachusetts Textile Mills in the Industrial Revolution

Textile manufacturing became the dominant industry in Massachusetts during the Industrial Revolution and helped promote further industrialization of the state.

Although other textile mills were established in Massachusetts in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, they were small and only employed a total of 100 people in the entire state.

Yet, these early mills gave local mechanics and engineers opportunities to learn rudimentary mill construction and inspired wealthy merchants in the state to think bigger and develop more sophisticated industrial plans.

One such wealthy merchant was Francis Cabot Lowell, a Newburyport native who formed the Boston Manufacturing Company, which later became the Boston Associates, and established his first mill in Waltham, Massachusetts in 1813.

Boston Manufacturing Company, 1813-1816, Waltham, Ma, engraving by Elijah Smith circa 19th century

Lowell’s mill used new types of technology, such as a water-driven power loom, and hired young adult women, known as “mill girls”, to run the equipment instead of children. The mill also did all of its manufacturing under one roof, with raw cotton entering at one end of the factory and finished cloth leaving at the other end.

This type of manufacturing and labor management later became known as the Lowell System and it completely revolutionized textile manufacturing, making it more efficient and cost effective and less dehumanizing to its workers.

After Lowell passed away from an illness in 1817, the Boston Associates opened a new, and much larger, mill town and named it Lowell. It was the first large scale mill town in America and was hugely successful.

Mills on the Merrimack River, Lowell, Mass, circa 1908

Due to Lowell’s success, many new mills and mill towns just like it began to sprout up along rivers across Massachusetts and New England. Around 45 mill towns were established during the Industrial Revolution just in Massachusetts alone.

These mill towns were:

Adams, Mass
Amesbury, Mass
Athol, Mass
Attleboro, Mass
Chicopee, Mass
Clinton, Mass
Dalton, Mass
Fall River, Mass
Fitchburg, Mass
Framingham, Mass
Gardner, Mass
Grafton, Mass
Greenfield, Mass
Haverhill, Mass
Holyoke, Mass
Hopedale, Mass
Hudson, Mass
Lawrence, Mass
Lowell, Mass
Ludlow, Mass
Lynn, Mass
Maynard, Mass
Merrimac, Mass
Methuen, Mass
Milford, Mass
Millbury, Mass
Monson, Mass
New Bedford, Mass
North Adams, Mass
North Andover, Mass
Northbridge, Mass
Orange, Mass
Palmer, Mass
Pittsfield, Mass
Rowley, Mass
Russell, Mass
Southbridge, Mass
Taunton, Mass
Uxbridge, Mass
Waltham, Mass
Ware, Mass
Webster, Mass
Westborough, Mass
Winchendon, Mass
Worcester, Mass

New England, and Massachusetts in particular, soon became a manufacturing powerhouse in America. The mills brought a surge in jobs and wealth to the state which helped further spur the industrialization of the state, according to the book Massachusetts: A Concise History:

“By 1850, the Boston Associates, including Edmund Dwight, Kirk Boott, Patrick T. Jackson, William Sturgis, Harrison Gray Otis, T.H. Perkins, Israel Thorndike, Abbott and Amos Lawrence, Nathan Appleton, the Lowells, the Cabots, the Quincys, and the Eliots, controlled most of the entire New England region’s large cotton mills. Their names could be found on the boards of directors, or as major stockholders, in virtually all of the cotton factories of the day. They managed or owned one-fifth of the entire U.S. textile industry with a complex array of interlocking directorates. These men controlled production by exchanging information on costs, posting similar bids for raw cotton, and by attempting to fix the price of finished goods. They monopolized the regional water power sites, had substantial interests in the subsidiary manufacture of textile machinery, and often built and rented out the houses of the workers. To gain access to new markets and to support new profitable ventures that would reduce their risks, they invested in the first railroads of the state, holding interests in one-third of the state’s railroad mileage by the late 1840s. By 1848 they possessed 40 percent of Boston’s bank stock and 38 percent of the state’s insurance industry. The investment pursuits of Boston’s capitalist elite helped make Massachusetts first in the nation in the high proportions of workers involved in manufacturing and nonagricultural activities.”

Starting in the 1830s and 1840s, the textile industry began a slow and gradual decline due to overproduction. There were so many highly efficient factories that textiles were being overproduced and their value dropped dramatically. As a result, many factory owners cut wages and hours which led to a lot of worker unrest, protests and strikes.

In the 1840s, the mill girls were slowly replaced by Irish immigrants seeking refuge in America from the Irish famine. These immigrant laborers were willing to work longer hours for lower pay and often put their children to work with them in the mills.

As a result, the Lowell System failed and the textile mills became what they were trying to avoid: a low-paying dehumanizing workplace that exploited the working poor and child laborers.

Massachusetts Textile Manufacturing During the Civil War:

When the Civil War began in 1861, many of the remaining mill girls quit the textile mills to become nurses, to help out at their family farms, or to take up positions that men had left when they went off to join the army.

The mills contributed to the war effort by making many of the wool uniforms for the Union army but a sudden Confederate embargo on cotton disrupted mill operations. When the mill’s raw cotton supplies became more valuable than the finished cloth they produced, the mills sold off all their supplies and temporarily shut down.

When the mills opened back up after the Civil War, some of the mill girls returned to work in the factories but the majority of the women had moved on to other jobs and were no longer interested in working in the mills.

For several decades after the Civil War, the mill’s production numbers steadily increased but took a turn for the worse in the 1890s when the aging mills had trouble competing with many new technological advances in the industry, particularly when new alternatives to water power were developed.

These changes made it easier to establish textiles mills in the South where cotton was grown locally and winter heating costs were lower. As a result, mill management ultimately decided not to modernize their Massachusetts mills and instead decided to put their money into building more modern textile mills in the South, according to the National Park Service website:

“Southern community and business leaders eager for development actively promoted industrialization by emphasizing the region’s advantages of abundant land, cheaper labor, energy sources, lower taxes, and transportation. Promoters also promised New England investors company towns free of union influences and restrictive laws concerning the health and safety of industrial workers. Lowell and other New England mill towns experienced an early version of the capital flight that plagued communities in the northeast and the Midwestern industrial heartland in the 1970s and 1980s.”

Massachusetts Textile Manufacturing During World War I:

Around the time of World War One, many textile companies in Massachusetts began to leave the state. The Bigelow Carpet Company (one of the first textile companies in Lowell) left in 1914, followed by the Middlesex Mill in 1918. The 1920s brought another wave of closings and relocations including the Hamilton Company, Suffolk, Tremont, Massachusetts Mills, Appleton Company and the Saco-Lowell Shop. By the 1930s, only the Merrimack mill, Lawrence mill, and Boott mill were still in operation in Massachusetts.

Massachusetts Textile Manufacturing During the Great Depression:

The Great Depression came early to the mills in Massachusetts and never left. By 1936, total textile employment had dropped to 8,000. Many mills were demolished or reduced in size to save on taxes.

The mills that were left made increasing demands of their workers and increased their workloads by assigning multiple machines to individual workers. At the Merrimack Mills, this prompted the workers to protest by going on strike. With World War II looming and a demand for textiles increasing as a result, the mills owners gave in to the worker’s demands and the workers returned.

Massachusetts Textile Manufacturing During World War II:

The war temporarily saved the mills and improved the local economy. The remaining mills, Merrimack mill, Boott mill and the Ames mill (formerly the Lawrence mill) received lucrative government contracts with companies such as Remington, General Electric and U.S. Rubber.

Employment at the mills increased and the departure of men for military service brought in many women to the workforce. Wages also increased as the demand for workers grew.

The war time boom was only temporary though and as soon as the war was over in 1945, orders for munitions and textiles fell and the local economy began to decline again.

In the 1950s, the last remaining textile mills, the Boott mill and the Merrimack mill, finally closed.

To learn more about the industrial revolution, check out my article on the Best Books About the Industrial Revolution.

Sources:
Massachusetts: A Concise History by Richard D. Brown
The Life and Times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775–1817 By Chaim M. Rosenberg
PBS: Who Made America? Francis Cabot Lowell: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/theymadeamerica/whomade/lowell_hi.html
NPS: Decline and Recovery – Lowell National Historical Park: https://www.nps.gov/lowe/learn/photosmultimedia/decline.htm
NPS: Waltham-Lowell System: https://www.nps.gov/lowe/learn/photosmultimedia/waltham_lowell.htm

About Rebecca Beatrice Brooks

Rebecca Beatrice Brooks is the owner and operator of this website and all the articles are written and researched by her. Rebecca is a freelance writer and history lover who got her start in journalism working for small-town newspapers in Massachusetts and New Hampshire after she graduated from the University of New Hampshire with a B.A. in journalism. Visit this site's About page to find out more about Rebecca.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *