What Was the New England Confederation?

The New England Confederation was a military alliance between the New England colonies of Plymouth, Connecticut, New Haven and Massachusetts Bay in the 17th century.

The alliance was formed in 1643 to provide joint military support against attacks by Native-Americans, the French and the Dutch.

What Inspired the New England Confederation?

The confederation was formed as a direct result of the Pequot War which was a war fought between the Pequot tribe and an alliance between the New England colonists and their Native-American allies the Mohegan and the Narragansetts.

The experience of working together to defeat their common enemies inspired the idea to create an official alliance, according to the book Conceived in Liberty:

“The experience of the Puritan colonies in the joint aggression against the Pequots, added to the continuing drive of Massachusetts Bay for domination over its neighbors, led to a more formal bond between them.”

The first time a confederation between the colonies was officially discussed was during the synod in August of 1637 for the condemnation of Anne Hutchinson.

It was attended by ministers from Connecticut and Massachusetts, including John Winthrop, who suggested the synod become an annual meeting of the ministers due to their mutual “distaste for unauthorized interpretation.”

Member Colonies of the New England ConfederationIn spring of 1638, several Connecticut ministers suggested a confederation but neither side could see eye to eye on the matter.

Connecticut brought up the issue again in 1639, as a result of threats from the New Netherland colony, but nothing came of it.

In 1640, threat of an Indian war prompted Rhode Island, Connecticut and New Haven to offer a joint proposal on the matter but the Massachusetts Bay Colony refused to work with Rhode Island, whom it viewed as too tolerant of other religions.

Finally, in the fall of 1642, Plymouth Colony proposed a confederation in which the General Courts in each colony would ratify all agreements.

The colonies all decided to send delegates to a meeting in the spring to finalize the details.

"Delegates Signing Agreement," New England Confederation, illustration published in a Pictorial History of the United States circa 1857

“Delegates Signing Agreement,” New England Confederation, illustration published in a Pictorial History of the United States circa 1857

The meeting took place in Boston in May, 1643. Representatives at the meeting included: John Winthrop and John Dudley from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Haynes, Edward Hopkins and George Fenwick from the Connecticut colony, William Collier and Edward Winslow from the Plymouth colony and Theophilus Easton and Thomas Gregson from the New Haven colony.

The New England Articles of Confederation:

After discussing the details of the confederation, the representatives created a 12-part document, called the Articles of Confederation of the United Colonies of New England, and signed it on May 19, 1643.

According to the terms of the confederation, each colony was given equal power and each colony’s responsibilities in the alliance were laid out.

The colonies were also required to provide two representatives each for an annual meeting. The locations of each meeting were to rotate each year among the colonies. Each decision made at the meetings required six votes to pass.

The individual colonies could call on the other colonies for help in an emergency but an overall vote was required. The number of armed men each colony sent in an emergency was based on the population size of the colony.

Since the Massachusetts Bay Colony was the largest, it was required to send 100 men while the other colonies were required to send 45 each.

As far as policing was concerned, the individual colonies were encouraged to avoid war as much as possible and to keep peace within its own colony in order to prevent enemies from taking advantage of internal problems.

In addition, runaway servants and slaves escaping to other colonies within the confederation were to be returned to their masters. Escaped prisoners were also to be returned.

Some colonies in New England were initially not invited to join the confederation in 1643. Rhode Island, Maine and New Hampshire were not invited to join because Maine and New Hampshire were considered prime targets for Native-American attacks and were deemed too dangerous.

Rhode Island was not invited because it was considered too religiously radical. Settled by Roger Williams, a religious outcast from Salem in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, Rhode Island had quickly become a refuge for religious outcasts and had a large number of Quakers, Anglicans and Roman Catholics, which the other colonies did not approve of.

In August or September of 1644, Rhode Island asked to join the confederation.The confederation responded by stating it could join on the condition that it merge with another colony, either Massachusetts Bay or Connecticut. Rhode Island refused.

The first few decades after the confederation was formed went by peacefully, with few problems or conflicts. The confederation’s biggest problem at the time was trying to figure out how to get Rhode Island to merge with another colony so they could get access to Rhode Island’s land and tone down the colony’s policies of religious tolerance, according to the book Encyclopedia of U.S. Political History:

“The only real challenge facing the Confederation was Rhode Island’s steadfast determination to remain an independent colony. The New England Confederation as a whole was concerned by Rhode Island’s religious tolerance of Quakers, Jews and Roman Catholics. The colonies of Massachusetts Bay and Connecticut also wanted access to Rhode Island’s coast and deep harbors; Rhode Island responded to the Confederation’s demands that the colony merge with Massachusetts Bay or Connecticut by negotiating a separate charter with the Long Parliament in 1644.”

To prevent the Massachusetts Bay Colony from seizing its land, Roger Williams traveled to Parliament in London to personally apply for a charter for Rhode Island in order to make the colony official and protect its land. Williams was successful and on March 14, 1644, Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Plantations granted Rhode Island its charter.

In September of 1648, Rhode Island asked again to join the confederation but the confederation refused.

The First Dutch-Anglo War:

England and the Dutch Republic began fighting for control of the land belonging to the New Netherland colony, which is now New York City, in the 1640s.

Both sides claimed the land was theirs and wanted complete control of it so they could have access to the Hudson river to conduct fur trade expeditions in the north, according to the book Colonial New York:

“Anglo-Dutch conflict over their respective territorial claims in the New World complicated matters still more. Based upon Henry Hudson’s explorations, the Dutch claimed all land between the fortieth and fifty-fourth degrees of north latitude (subsequently extended southward), although the States-General had not actually designated any boundaries when it created New Netherland in the 1620s. England, meanwhile, insisted that it had historic title to the territory between thirty-four and forty-eight degrees. Though Plymouth’s governor, William Bradford, was himself willing to ignore the obvious overlap, he warned the Dutch that if the home governments did not settle the controversy, it would be ‘harder and with more difficulty obtained hereafter, and perhaps not without blows.'”

In 1650, the confederation signed a treaty, known as the Treaty of Hartford, with the New Netherland colony that established clear boundaries between English and Dutch lands. The New England Confederation never submitted the treaty for ratification in England though, deciding instead to make treaties on its own in an attempt to self-govern.

In 1652, the First Anglo-Dutch war broke out, which was a naval war between the English and the Dutch over trade routes and colonies. Connecticut and New Haven considered the First Anglo-Dutch war a threat to their safety and asked for assistance from the confederation. Massachusetts and Plymouth considered the war to be an unnecessary conflict and refused assistance.

The confederation reached a stalemate when four votes were cast in favor of offering assistance and four votes were cast against it. The confederation decided to remain neutral on the war.

Charles II later seized the New Netherland colony in 1664, took over the fur trade in the colony and gave the colony to his younger brother James, the Duke of York, who renamed it New York.

King Philip’s War:

In 1675, King Philip’s War broke out which resulted in an immediate need for military support throughout southern New England.

The war was fought between Wampanoag Indians and the English colonists in New England, according to the book International Encyclopedia of Military History:

“The war for dominance of New England was the product of a half-century of tensions. After the Pilgrims established Plymouth in 1620, the Wampanoags signed several treaties ceding territory to the settlers. In 1662, the new Wampanoag leader, Metacomet (called Philip by the English) realized the Indians had gone so far in accommodating the English that the survival of Indian culture and traditions was in danger….The Wampanoags gained support from the Nipmunks, Narragansetts,and smaller tribes. The combined Indian forces led attacks on six white settlements…”

The confederation voted in favor of providing military assistance for the war and officially declared war on the Native-Americans on September 9, 1675. By December of 1675, the Confederation raised an army of over 1,000 armed men.

The war lasted fourteen months, officially coming to an end in August of 1676, and is considered one of the bloodiest colonial Indian wars. Between 600 to 800 colonists and 3,000 Indians were killed.

Half of the English towns in New England were damaged and about 12 were destroyed. Most of the surviving Indians were either sold into slavery or forced to leave New England.

The End of the New England Confederation:

Although the colonists won King Philip’s War, the conflict brought some of the Confederation’s problems to the surface. Connecticut had resented having to send soldiers to the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Plymouth, particularly because those colonies had refused to assist Connecticut and New Haven after the outbreak of the First Anglo-Dutch war.

The Massachusetts Bay colonists also felt it was unfair that they had to provide more soldiers than any of the other colonies. In addition, Rhode Island provided the confederation with a lot of military support and wanted to be admitted to the confederation as an equal partner. The other colonies refused because they disapproved of Rhode Island’s tolerance of Quakers, Catholics, and Anglicans.

This tension led to a lot of political instability in New England in the 1670s and early 1680s. When Charles II tried to tighten his control over the squabbling colonies, the Massachusetts Bay Colony defiantly resisted, which resulted in the colony have its charter revoked in 1684.

In 1686, James II then merged the New England colonies into one mega colony, known as the Dominion of New England, which officially brought the confederation to an end.

Although confederation was over, the experience had a long-lasting effect on the colonists, according to the book Encyclopedia of U.S. Political History:

“The political influence of the New England Confederation can be traced into the next century. In 1754, representatives from seven Northern colonies traveled to Albany, New York, to discuss union with the powerful Iroquois Confederacy. Two of the seven, Massachusetts Bay and Connecticut, were original members of the New England Confederation. Another three, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and New York, were familiar with the alliance’s workings. While unification at Albany eventually proved unfeasible, many of its planners, most notably Benjamin Franklin, went on to help draft the formative documents of the United States in 1776. The 40-year history of the New England Confederation amply demonstrated that unity between colonies was both possible and beneficial.”

The experience of working together in the confederation may have later inspired the colonies to join together yet again in defeating another enemy, the British government, during the American Revolution.

International Encyclopedia of Military History. Edited by James C. Bradford, Routledge, 2004.
Rothbard, Murray Newton and Leonard P. Liggio. Conceived in Liberty. Vol. 1, Arlington House Publishers, 1975.
Weir, David A. Early New England: A Covenanted Society. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005.
Encyclopedia of U.S. Political History. Edited by Andrew Robertson, CQ Press, 2010.
Jones, Capers. The History and Future of Narragansett Bay. Universal Publishers, 2006.
Kammen, Michael G. Colonial New York: A History. Oxford University Press, 1996.
Richman, Irving Berdine. Rhode Island: Its Making and Its Meaning. G.P. Putnam, 1908.
Select Charters and Other Documents Illustrative of American History 1606-1775. Edited by William MacDonald, The Macmillan company, 1904.
Richman, Irving Berdine. Rhode Island: A Study in Separatism. Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1905.
Greenspan, Jesse. “The Dutch Surrender New Netherland, 350 Years Ago.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 8 Sept. 2014, www.history.com/news/the-dutch-surrender-new-netherland-350-years-ago
Barry, John M. “God, Government and Roger Williams’ Big Idea.” Smithsonian Magazine, Smithsonian Institute,  January 2012, www.smithsonianmag.com/history/god-government-and-roger-williams-big-idea-6291280/?no-ist

What Was the New England Confederation?

About Rebecca Beatrice Brooks

Rebecca Beatrice Brooks is the author and publisher of the History of Massachusetts Blog. Rebecca is a freelance journalist and history lover who got her start in journalism working for small-town newspapers in Massachusetts and New Hampshire after she graduated from the University of New Hampshire with a B.A. in journalism. Visit this site's About page to find out more about Rebecca.

3 thoughts on “What Was the New England Confederation?

  1. Laura Taylor Hazel

    Hello Rebecca, this is another very interesting and “meaty” (in regards to hist. substance)…..I enjoy your blogs very much. Am writing a family biography that goes back to 1635 in Mass. on one side of family, 1819 on other side of family. Both family lines from England; Porter (1635) and Taylor (1819) are the family names. I almost always find relevant information in your blogs, that relate to my families–where they were and what was going on for them locally. Adding historical context to personal family history, go hand in hand when a narrative that is being written.
    I love this project, okay, let’s call it a passion! I intend to publish. Can you please provide me with specific reference information for putting into my bibliography, when quoting or otherwise using what comes from your blogs and/or

  2. Carol Terry

    Thanks for the interesting bit of history that is seldom covered in college history classes.

Comments are closed.